-
Damien George authored
We still have FAST_[0,1,2] byte codes, but they now just access the fastn array (before they had special local variables). It's now simpler, a bit faster, and uses a bit less stack space (on STM at least, which is most important). The only reason now to keep FAST_[0,1,2] byte codes is for compressed byte code size.
d0691cca